It’s no surprise that the global equity markets have started the year on a volatile path. The assumed culprit is the fear that a potentially global economic slowdown is intensifying. The good news is that while turbulent markets are no fun, they are rarely negative over the long-term when managed with discipline.
Here is what you need to know: markets can lose 10%, 20%, and in some cases even over 30% WITHOUT triggering a recession – and when these declines do occur, all such market losses are historically eroded in the following year(s). Sometimes the hardest thing to do in times of stress is to do nothing at all.
Last night Ben Carlson posted a spot-on analysis of market pull-backs in non-recessionary periods. We shared it with his permission below.
The stock market is a forward looking indicator. Markets are meant to discount future cash flows and events to a present value. It’s not always right — stocks have predicted four out of the last eight recessions and so on — but investors are constantly looking for signals in stock prices to shape their current outlook.
In a swift drop like we’ve seen in the recent drawdown it’s easy for many investors start to confuse the stock market and the economy. This latest episode has many on recession watch. And it makes sense that people would think this way considering how long this current economic cycle has lasted.
Most of the largest crashes in stocks have coincided with a recession — 1929-32, 1937-38, 1973-74, 2000-2002 and 2007-2009 come to mind. Many of the level-headed, intelligent people I follow don’t seem to believe we’ll see a recession this year. They could be wrong and so could I, but we don’t generally go into a recession until excesses have built up in the system. It’s the old adage that you can’t kill yourself jumping off of a two foot ledge.
Having said that, even if we don’t go into a recession that doesn’t mean the stock market can’t or won’t see a significant sell-off. Double-digit losses and even bear markets can certainly occur without a big economic downturn. This scenario has played out many times throughout history, as you can see from the following data:
This has happened roughly one out of every five years since the late-1930s. If this does turn out to be one of these non-recessionary down markets then we’re more than half way through the average loss scenario (with the standard caveat that markets are never average in real time).
While losses in the stock market are never enjoyable they’re still the best chance most of us have to see large gains in the future. This is the paradox of investing that is so painful and counterintuitive for people to grasp. Lower prices mean higher yields and higher expected future returns when new cash is put to work.
Here are those same losses but this time I have added the subsequent 5 and 10 year total returns. (And because no one can really nail the bottom perfectly, I even showed the gains starting at the beginning of the following year, thus making these numbers fairly conservative.):
I realize that visualizing future gains isn’t very helpful in the midst of a market sell-off. Psychologically and emotionally, losing money is difficult to stomach. Our brains are hard wired to find losses more painful that gains are pleasurable.
Investors have become conditioned to assume that every stock market sell-off lines up perfectly with a financial crisis. While you can never completely rule out a full-blown panic because of investor emotions, reflexivity or an unexpected event, we don’t have to experience a 2008-level crisis every time there’s a correction or bear market.